Skip to main content


A Survey on Open Ended Mutual Funds

Issue Abstract

Abstract
This paper has inspected the execution related qualities of open completed shared. With the ultimate objective of execution appraisal, peril adjusted execution, asset size and cost extent of the mutual resources have been focused on for ongoing years for example from April' 2006 to March'2011. Through this investigation, the association between executions related characteristics and execution of Indian shared resources has been considered. Diverse backslide model has been for the assessment. Results have asserted the proximity of execution unfaltering quality in like manner resources. This exhibits the past execution record is very important in anticipating the future execution of the mutual resource. Budgetary authorities must get a gander at the past execution before placing assets into any benefit and resource directors may follow the best performing methods By utilizing looking past showing up record. In like manner, test assessment has shown that minimal effort extent and colossal asset size of the mutual resources has achieved their high risk adjusted returns. This investigation has contributed towards existing learning for the relationship between regular resource's execution and their properties. It will in like manner help regular resource theorists to pass judgment on the endeavor decisions based on a couple of advantage's characteristics isolated from just the entry execution.
Keywords: Mutual Funds, Assert value, Assert Allocation,


Author Information
Mrs. Pushpa A,
Issue No
8
Volume No
6
Issue Publish Date
05 Aug 2024
Issue Pages
8-10

Issue References

References

[1] Dowen and Mann, (2004), Mutual fund performance, management behaviour and investor costs, Financial Services Review, 13(1), pp 79-91.
[2] Droms and Walker, (2001), Persistence of mutual fund operating characteristics: returns, turnover rates, and expense ratios, Applied Financial Economics, 11(4), pp 457-466.
[3] Jan, Y. C. and Hung, M. W., (2003), Mutual Fund Attributes and Performance, Financial Services Review, 12, pp 165- 178.
[4] Philpot et al., (1998), Active Management Fund Size and Bond Mutual Fund Returns, The Financial Review, 33, pp 115- 126.
[5] Chen, H. L., Jegadeesh, N. and Wermers, R., (2000), The Value of Active Mutual Fund Management: An Examination of the Stockholdings and Trades of Fund Managers, Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 35(3), pp 343-368.
[6] Indro, D. C., Jiang, C. X., Hu, M. V., and Lee, W. Y., (1999), Mutual \fund performance: Does fund size matter?, Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), pp 74-87.
[7] Droms and Walker, (1994), Investment Performance of International Mutual Funds, The Journal of Financial Research, 17(1), pp 1-14.
[8] Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S., (1993), Performance measurement without benchmarks: an examination of mutual fund returns, Journal of Business, 66(1), pp 47-68.
[9] Droms and Walker, (2001), Persistence of mutual fund operating characteristics: returns, turnover rates, and expense ratios, Applied Financial Economics, 11(4), pp 457-466